Which is obviously true. Scientists cant see every nook and cranny of existence
Is there any abstract quality we could expect some not-yet-discovered existng thing to have? Some quality that would help to understand why scientists havent observed it yet?
Added (1). Im thinking that some thing that scientists havent discovered is maybe very small… or very far away… or elusive somehow because it produces no trace in any gravitational, electrical, etc field. Everything we know about is based on what makes particles move around basically… Everytihng that happens in reality seems to be motion of particles on some fundamental level, right? if something hasnt yet been detected by science, then it seems reasonable that it doesnt make particles around us move very much, or very often… is that fair?
Added (2). Im thinking that some thing that scientists havent discovered is maybe very small… or very far away… or elusive somehow because it produces no trace in any gravitational, electrical, etc field. Everything we know about is based on what makes particles move around basically… Everytihng that happens in reality seems to be motion of particles on some fundamental level, right? if something hasnt yet been detected by science, then it seems reasonable that it doesnt make particles around us move very much, or very often… is that fair?
См. статью: So lets assume thre is stuff that exists that scientists dont know about?